|
|
Transport policy
and sustainable development A basic concept of
the Common European Market is the free movement of people, goods and services.
In 1992, the European Union issued a White Paper on transport. This identified
the serious imbalances in Europe’s transport system including bottlenecks such
as the Brenner transalpine route in Austria and the poor network in a number of
peripheral parts of the Union. In addition, road transport was creating
significant increases to atmospheric pollution and dangerous roads resulted in
44,000 deaths a year. To address these
problems the common transport policy established a Trans-European Network for
Transport (TEN-T). Other objectives of the policy embrace the concept of modal
choice and related to the integration of transport networks to encourage
switching to less polluting or underused modes including rail and inland
waterways; protecting the environment relating principally to pollution control;
and safety including the harmonisation of construction standards and improved
infrastructure. Also the European Union is encouraging a reversal to the decline
in rail freight. Seven objectives
were approved for TEN-T, in particular objective 1 states: “Ensure
the sustainable and safe mobility of persons and goods within the area without
internal frontiers under the best possible social conditions, while contributing
to the attainment of the Community’s environmental objectives”. The associated
guidelines approved by the European Parliament in 1996 support the objective
under Article 2 which requires that TENs should contribute to the Community’s
environmental objectives. The 1996 extent of
the TEN-T throughout E.U. member states comprised the construction and upgrading
of 140 road schemes including: - 11 rail links; - 57 combined transport projects; - 26 inland
waterways. The development of
the TEN-T remains one of the European Union’s top priorities and has received
significant funding; for example ECU 38.4 billion in 1996-97 from Community
funds and European Investment Bank loans. For the period 2000-2006 the
Commission’s budget is ECU 5 billion and it seeks to encourage public –
private partnerships. A more recent
initiative of the European Union and arising from TEN-T is the Pan-European
Corridor for Central and Eastern Europe. The planning and development of these
routes is known as TINA (Transport Infrastructure Needs Assessment). Alpine Convention Vienna
Declaration The Vienna
Declaration was adopted in 1997 by the Regional Conference on Transport and the
Environment of the UN-ECE. Within the context of an anticipated increase in
demand for transport, the Declaration called for its development to be
undertaken “within the framework of sustainable development” including the
principles of protection, precaution, prevention and ‘polluter pays’ to meet
objectives such as preserving public health and ecosystems. The Declaration sets
out recommendations and an Action Plan relating to the promotion of energy
efficient and less polluting vehicles and fuels including: III Efficient and
sustainable transport systems IV Protection of
sensitive areas V Safe transport of
dangerous goods VI Prevention of
water pollution The Action Plan
encourages the application of strategic environmental assessment in the
transport planning process at the international and national level, with
obligatory environmental impact assessment relating to individual schemes at a
national level. Also at the national level, it calls for the protection of
landscape and ecologically sensitive areas with respect
to the existing and proposed road and rail infrastructure. A review of the
Action Plan is proposed in 2002 and 2007. “Environment
for Europe”, Aarhus In 1998, the year
following the Vienna Declaration, the fourth Ministerial Conference
“Environment for Europe” held at Aarhus declared that further action was
required with respect to the growth in traffic, the associated biological
diversity/habitat loss and the need “to secure a sustainable and
environmentally sound pattern of transport”. The same conference saw the
requirement to develop economic and financial incentives to assist with the
integration of biological diversity and landscape conservation into sectional
policies. Hanover
Conference (CEMAT) The Guiding
Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent,
adopted in 2000 at the Hanover Conference of the European Conference of
Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT), emphasise the importance of
both the TEN-T and TINA network, in particular the need for a rapid completion
of missing links so as to improve regional accessibility (Council of Europe
2000, para 20, 21, 34). Euro-corridors are
presented as a priority in the implementation of the Guiding Principles on
account of the perceived (but not necessarily proven) association with economic
development. Importantly (para. 61) states that the investment in Euro-corridors
should take account of the ‘needs of environmental protection’. It goes on
to say: “Major
transport projects should not therefore be undertaken without assessing their
direct and indirect impact. Structural planning measures must be introduced to
reduce any negative effects and highlight their positive impact at local and
regional level. Such measures should include spatial and environmental impact
assessments for plans, programmes and projects, the co-ordination of regional
and inter regional major infrastructure, large-scale landscape planning,
securing protected areas or concentrations of roads, railway lines and navigable
waterways in a single corridor.” With
respect to transport paragraph 61 is particularly important as it directly
relates to one of the main objectives of the Guiding Principles. In relation to
the transport network the ten point programme stresses that: “the
networks should, if necessary, be reviewed and augmented taking sustainable
development and environmental aspects into account.” In addition to the
consideration of transport needs CEMAT recognised the role of enhancing and
protecting natural resources and the natural heritage in an integrated spatial
planning policy. |
|